<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Learn To Duck - Latest Comments in Innovate, Iterate and then Innovate Again</title><link>http://micahbaldwin.disqus.com/</link><description>Succeeding Through Failing</description><atom:link href="https://micahbaldwin.disqus.com/innovate_iterate_and_then_innovate_again/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:46:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Innovate, Iterate and then Innovate Again</title><link>http://learntoduck.com/startups/innovate.iterate.innovate/#comment-557510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nacyjc,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks. I think that often young companies focus on the volume of  &lt;br&gt;innovations versus the quality. At the same time, its a real balancing  &lt;br&gt;act. Look at FriendFeed. They innovated early, and now are just  &lt;br&gt;iterating on their basic concept. Their competitor SocialThing focused  &lt;br&gt;on some early innovations, but then disappeared off the face of the  &lt;br&gt;earth. The only thing I can think of is that they are back "in the  &lt;br&gt;lab" coming up with new innovations, while their current feature set  &lt;br&gt;and community languishes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Innovate, Iterate then Innovate again, really successful companies do  &lt;br&gt;this again and again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Micah Baldwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Innovate, Iterate and then Innovate Again</title><link>http://learntoduck.com/startups/innovate.iterate.innovate/#comment-557458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Micah -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave and I have been discussing this very topic of late.  How does a young company with a hot technology AND a customer base leverage that customer community to make the right choices in moving the product / solution forward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The cool and groovy enhancements can be bright shiny objects that distract from building upon current success to gain market share / adoption and grow the business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You captured it - if you have a customer base - listen to the collective voice, make decisions that will create loyalty and keep you ahead of the pack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cool post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nancycompton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Innovate, Iterate and then Innovate Again</title><link>http://learntoduck.com/startups/innovate.iterate.innovate/#comment-551895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great point, twitter is 'not a circus barker for the crap I am posting online'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your post also goes back to the way I treat a stack of tickets/issues users have.  Fix it the first time, and if you keep seeing it again, that is an area to fix/innovate.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benr75</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>